How to TwitterThis is a featured page

The Best Way to Build a Twitter Account? Step by Step.

You signed up for Twitter, added a short bio, uploaded an avatar and are Tweeting regularly, but still nobody's following you. Now what?The way most Twitter users (especially new ones) build a base of Twitter followers is by following people themselves. Lots of people follow-back people who follow them, so by going out and following people you should be able to accumulate a lot of followers.I recently spent some time using data fromTwitter Graderto test this assumption. I broke up the database into "buckets" of users based on how many users they're following. If you're following around 100 users, you're in the 100-user bucket, if you're following close to 1000 users, you're in that bucket. The graph below shows the number of users in each bucket (the red line) and the average number of followers the users in each bucket have (the blue line).
How to Twitter - Margot B's BlogThe red line indicates that most users aren't following a ton of people, which is expected given that most users aren't Twitter-addicts. The blue line, however, tells a more interesting story:People who follow lots of people tend to have lots of followers themselves.Let's look at little closer at the follow-back assumption. The graph below shows the distribution of Twitter users at each following to follower ratio.How to Twitter - Margot B's BlogWe see that most users have close to a 1:1 ratio of following to followers, meaning that many users follow-back those that follow them. So does that mean you should go nuts and follow tons and tons of people? To answer that question, let's look at how your following/follower ratio is related to the number of people that follow you.The graph below shows the average number of followers of users based on their ratio. A ratio of 0.5 means that you follow half the number of people that are following you, and a ratio of 2 means you follow twice as many people as are following you.
How to Twitter - Margot B's Blog
This shows that users with a low following to follower ratio tend to have a high number of followers. That means that if your goal is to build a Twitter account with lots of followers, and we assume these factors have some sort of causal relationship,you should try to keep your ratio near or under 1 (following the same number of people as follow you or less).ConclusionThe data shows that the best way to build a robust Twitter account is via a stepped approach. Follow a few people (a few of them will follow you back), then follow a few more.Don't go crazy following thousands of people. Do it slowly and build up your followers gradually.

Webinar: Twitter for Marketing and PR


twitter for marketing and pr

Want to learn more about using Twitter for Marketing and PR?
Download the free webinar for tips and tricks to drive inbound marketing using Twitter.
Posted by Dan Zarrella on Thu, Mar 26, 2009 @ 07:29 AM
var MassActPostScript = "__doPostBack('dnn$_ctl9$_ctl0$BlogView','####')"; function DisableEnableLinks(xHow){ objLinks = document.links; for(i=0;i

COMMENTS

Hi
I really liked your post about following and being followed on Twitter; a stepped approach seems very wise and has worked for me so far. I would be interested to see something on how Twitterers perceive those with an extremely high ratio of followers to following. It often strikes me as a little standoffish--are these Twitterers getting a slavish following through other means (celebrity, their website, etc.) and don't need to follow back? What are other opinions and are others put off by this? Thanks! posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 8:33 AM by Erika Kotite
"We see that most users have close to a 1:1 ratio of following to followers, meaning that many users follow-back those that follow them."

a very scientific approach (and conclusion) indeed!
BTW how did you decide that having a close-enough 1:1 ratio proves that the actual users in each group correspond correspond?!? posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM by LucaP
Why are we obsessed with numbers again? Why do you want lots of followers? What does that mean? If I have 10,000 followers, is that good? Not if 90% are irrelevant and adding no value to my personal network. I personally don't care about numbers, it is the quality of the engagement that matters and I only want people following me who are genuinely interested in my updates or who can help/influence the community I wish to engage with.

The whole followers thing is becoming a smokescreen, it is like untargeted direct mail. Anyone can build a database of millions of names but why bother is most of them don't care what you have to say?

I'm enjoying your Twitter series as it provokes discussion but I can't wait for the quality v quantity mentality to set in.

However, some people might be using Twitter simply as a popularity and positive reinforcement contest, so building followers might make them feel better!

thanks
james posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 8:52 AM by James Gurd
As a brand and social media strategist, working now with a diverse mix of clients, putting social media backbone into position, my Twitter mantra has been to concentrate on quality, and the aggregation of groups, so that those you are following offer relevancy, (like a custom newsfeed)

and those following you benefit from what you share..I agree with phased approach, but best practices are still emerging...

posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 9:04 AM by Lou Sagar
Interesting - I was actually pondering this today. I am not particularly interested in having hordes of followers, but when I have something insightful to share, I will and am interested in other people's thinking, especially company leaders. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 9:29 AM by Janet Carlson
Very interesting and great analysis. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 9:39 AM by Brian Hickey
I am also interested in "Twitter etiquette". When people decide to follow us, is it good etiquette to follow-back? Or if we decide not to follow-back, is it perceived as we're above following them? posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 10:07 AM by Jami Jackson
"assume these factors have some sort of causal relationship"

I think this is a highly questionable assumption. Celebrities, like Wil Wheaton or Kevin Smith have a lot more followers than following precisely because they are famous.

Services like senate.gov or cnn might also have large numbers of followers without following back.

The average Joe or Jane can't employ the same strategy and expect the same results as some of the heavy hitters. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM by willingthrall
Does these figures take include all the big twitter accounts with 10,000's of followers? I.e. BarackObama and CNN etc. As including these can skew the results.

If the same analysis was done without these it would be interesting to see as this gives a more realistic result.

Just a thought… posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 10:37 AM by Nigel Lamb
A retweet for sure! Everyone loves Twitter now. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 10:58 AM by Blog Expert
I only have three followers on Twitter. Informative article! posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 12:12 PM by Hassam
There is a local company here in Boise that offers a program for $200 that will UP your numbers which they claim will increase your reach, which we all know from MRKTG 101 will increase the bottom line.
They proved the model on themselves & their company (http://MesiabLabs.com)but there is a catch....
THEY ACTUALLY CONVERSE WITH THEIR MASS FOLLOWERS!
They turn to their followers for input and feedback. They launch products to them first, they engage in conversations as if they only had 500 followers.
Even those that have the 1:1 ratio will fail if they don't engage, distribute, RT & treat their followers as THE best customers.
Good luck!
posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 12:40 PM by Jen Harris
Dan - as a Hubspot customer who loves what you guys do - I have to say this article is NOT a step-by-step guide to the best way to build a Twitter account. That is a complex topic, and this post focuses only on the fact that a 1:1 following ratio is most common.
But that number means very little, because there are lots of reasons people have a 1:1 ratio, having to do with automation and people's notions of appropriateness and fairness. Many very successful Twitterers have a very low following/followers ratio.

For a step-by-step guide to building a good Twitter community, readers should try http://tinyurl.com/cph74l

Thanks and keep up the great flow of Hubspot products. they're great tools.

-isaac d van wesep posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 12:48 PM by Isaac D. Van Wesep
@isaac interesting points, I'd love to see the data you based your step-by-step guide on. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 12:53 PM by Dan Zarrella
I agree with the step approach. While I am no @guykawasaki (despite the fact I play ice hockey with him), I've tried to keep my following / followers within 100. Slow and steady can be frustrating however.

Personally I am always skeptical of folks who have extremely high or extremely low ratios. Dunno why exactly.

I used to follow everyone who followed me but found that unless there was some degree of interest alignment (internet marketing, social media, technology, ice hockey, etc.), those folks would UFM (qwitter). So now I generally follow those who follow me except if I feel I have nothing in common or don't see any interest in their last 5 tweets.

@smokejumper posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 1:14 PM by Brent Harrison
Do what you do and do it well.

Most successful Twitter accounts follow a very specific set of rules: they only post what is interesting to them. That may sound a little narcissistic but isn't that what most Twitterers are?

The fact that others 'subscribe' to our posts is irrelevant. What matters most is that we are disseminating information we feel is of importance.

Whether or not people are following you because they like what you have to say about a subject, or what you shouldn't have eaten for lunch that day is less as important than the ability to quickly get information out quickly.

That is why Tweeters like @mayhemstudios, @Minervity, @andysowards @Mashable and the like have such HUGE followers: they focus on a few topics of interest and post them so others of like interests can partake in their knowledge.

I (@mimojito) focus on four main groupings: design (tutorials, inspirations, tips & tricks), development (css, html, javascript, jquery et al), SEO & Social Media and topics others post that pique my curiosity.

Twitter is less about who's following you but rather it's more about what you can contribute to the overall community.

My two cents. posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM by Efren
My ratio is something like 5:3, more that I follow than follow me. The ratio is mostly unbalanced because I follow a lot of Twitters that are pumping information and links into Twittersphere all day long. I can hardly expect those people to follow me. The would be more likely to follow if I was similarily active on Twitter in a field that would interest them.

But I am vain like everybody else and I am very pleased when people follow me back. 1:1 balance is not predicted for me in the near future. Who cares?

@sigurarm posted on Thursday, March 26, 2009 at 4:12 PM by Sigurdur Armannsson


margotb
margotb
Latest page update: made by margotb , Mar 26 2009, 6:41 PM EDT (about this update About This Update margotb Edited by margotb

1962 words added
11 images added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: twitter
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.